http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040301&s=
trb030104
Republicans call John Kerry a hypocrite for
vowing to cleanse the White House of special
interests. They make three arguments. The first
is very weak.
The first argument is the simplest: Kerry takes
money from special interests, too. Last week,
the Bush campaign released a Web video titled
"Unprincipled, Chapter 1." Kerry, the video
charged, takes "more special interest money
than any other senator." That's based on a
January 31 Washington Post story, which noted
that Kerry "has raised more money from paid
lobbyists than any other senator over the past
15 years." But the Post figure is misleading because it
ignores the fact that Kerry has largely eschewed
money from political action committees (PACs),
a major source of funds for most of his
colleagues. When you combine money from
paid lobbyists and PACs--which makes sense,
since they're both conduits for "special
interests"--Kerry actually ranks ninety-second
out of 100 U.S. senators. That doesn't make
him pure, but it makes him purer than most
serious candidates for the White House. And it
puts him on a different planet from President
Bush, who accepted more money from
lobbyists last year alone than Kerry has in the
last 15.
B
Baerwald
(view)
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040301&s=
trb030104
Republicans call John Kerry a hypocrite for
vowing to cleanse the White House of special
interests. They make three arguments. The first
is very weak.
The first argument is the simplest: Kerry takes
money from special interests, too. Last week,
the Bush campaign released a Web video titled
"Unprincipled, Chapter 1." Kerry, the video
charged, takes "more special interest money
than any other senator." That's based on a
January 31 Washington Post story, which noted
that Kerry "has raised more money from paid
lobbyists than any other senator over the past
15 years." But the Post figure is misleading because it
ignores the fact that Kerry has largely eschewed
money from political action committees (PACs),
a major source of funds for most of his
colleagues. When you combine money from
paid lobbyists and PACs--which makes sense,
since they're both conduits for "special
interests"--Kerry actually ranks ninety-second
out of 100 U.S. senators. That doesn't make
him pure, but it makes him purer than most
serious candidates for the White House. And it
puts him on a different planet from President
Bush, who accepted more money from
lobbyists last year alone than Kerry has in the
last 15.
