Icon Again... having it both way
R
Rogertick (view)

Is Bin Laden still worth catching, I would think so, but here we have a contradiction to a statement made last week that our government was going to "redouble" it efforts to find Bin Laden and other terrorists. Now I guess he's not so important anymore.
 
My head is dizzy with the contradictions, lies, smoke and mirror games our country seems to be playing.  What is our goal? What is our stratagy? I guess its whatever serves the purpose of the moment.
I think the only way we'll ever find Osama Aand Sadaam is if they end up sitting on the pipeline, shareing a nice lunch or a quiet moment, at the exact spot where America wants to put its own oil "tapper", where we can syphon off oll the oil we want.
 
 
November 21, 3003
U.S. General Says Bin Laden 'Out of the Picture'
2 hours, 16 minutes ago

By Yousuf Azimy

BAGRAM, Afghanistan (Reuters) - A senior U.S. general said on Friday that al Qaeda mastermind Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) had "taken himself out of the picture" and that his capture was not essential to winning the "war on terror."

WARNING: Image embedded by poster. ‘Photo’
Reuters Photo

WARNING: Image embedded by poster. ‘AP Photo Photo’
AP Photo
WARNING: Image embedded by poster. ‘Slideshow’ Slideshow: Afghanistan

 

General Peter Pace, vice chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at U.S. military headquarters just north of Kabul that the 11,500-strong U.S.-led force hunting al Qaeda and Taliban militants was not focusing on individuals.

"He (bin Laden) has taken himself out of the picture," Pace told reporters after visiting U.S. troops serving in Afghanistan (news - web sites).

"It is not an individual that is as important as is the ongoing campaign of the coalition against terrorists," he said.

America's new ambassador to Kabul Zalmay Khalilzad said earlier this week that the U.S. military would "redouble" its efforts to find bin Laden and other al Qaeda and Taliban leaders.

While appearing to contradict this, Pace, added: "That is not to say that we would not be glad to capture Osama bin Laden today or tomorrow."

He said U.S.-led forces were winning their war against "terrorists" in Afghanistan, despite nearly 400 people being killed in just over three months in the bloodiest period since the Taliban's ouster two years ago.

"The fact that the enemy is not pooling up in waves that can be attacked in large numbers to me means that in fact the coalition is being effective," Pace said.

There have been very few major clashes between U.S. forces and Islamic militants in the past two years.

In the most recent case, hundreds of Taliban were hunted down by U.S. forces and Afghan troops in the troubled provinces of Uruzgan and Zabul in August and early September, leading to the death of over a hundred rebels.

But generally U.S. operations, including the latest launched in the northeast earlier this month, kill few militants due to their apparent ability to blend into local populations or flee into the hills, often crossing into neighboring Pakistan.

"We will continue to pursue them to make sure that they don't re-establish any kind of a stronghold," said Pace.

He added that civilian-military teams already in some cities were the ideal way for the international community to contribute to Afghan stability, and that Pakistan and Afghanistan should work together to fight militants active on their common frontier.

Afghanistan suspects Pakistan is turning a blind eye to Taliban and al Qaeda remnants, but Islamabad says it is doing all it can to support the U.S. "war on terror."

Also believed to be at large in Afghanistan or Pakistan are Taliban supreme leader Mullah Mohammad Omar and bin Laden's deputy Ayman al-Zawahri.

–--
“Stupidity has a certain charm - ignorance does not” - Zappa - Yeah you know who you are.
[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts