heathcliffe
location: woods
listening to: silence
registered: 2008.11.18
posts: 956
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
We need to reintroduce the Fairness Doctrine whose elimination gave rise
to Rush Limbaugh and his ilk.
Everything you need to know about the Fairness Doctrine in one post
By Dylan Matthews August 23, 2011
On Monday, FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced the elimination of
83 regulations, including one of the agency’s most famous: the Fairness
Doctrine. What is the Fairness Doctrine, and why is it gone?What it was: The Fairness Doctrine, as initially laid out in the report,
”In the Matter of Editorializing by Broadcast Licensees,” required that
TV and radio stations holding FCC-issued broadcast licenses to (a) devote
some of their programming to controversial issues of public importance
and (b) allow the airing of opposing views on those issues. This meant
that programs on politics were required to include opposing opinions on
the topic under discussion. Broadcasters had an active duty to determine
the spectrum of views on a given issue and include those people best
suited to representing those views in their programming.Additionally, the rule mandated that broadcasters alert anyone subject to
a personal attack in their programming and give them a chance to respond,
and required any broadcasters who endorse political candidates to invite
other candidates to respond. However, the Fairness Doctrine is different
from the Equal Time rule, which is still in force and requires equal time
be given to legally qualified political candidates.
H
heathcliffe
(view)
We need to reintroduce the Fairness Doctrine whose elimination gave rise
to Rush Limbaugh and his ilk.
Everything you need to know about the Fairness Doctrine in one post
By Dylan Matthews August 23, 2011
On Monday, FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced the elimination of
83 regulations, including one of the agency’s most famous: the Fairness
Doctrine. What is the Fairness Doctrine, and why is it gone?What it was: The Fairness Doctrine, as initially laid out in the report,
”In the Matter of Editorializing by Broadcast Licensees,” required that
TV and radio stations holding FCC-issued broadcast licenses to (a) devote
some of their programming to controversial issues of public importance
and (b) allow the airing of opposing views on those issues. This meant
that programs on politics were required to include opposing opinions on
the topic under discussion. Broadcasters had an active duty to determine
the spectrum of views on a given issue and include those people best
suited to representing those views in their programming.Additionally, the rule mandated that broadcasters alert anyone subject to
a personal attack in their programming and give them a chance to respond,
and required any broadcasters who endorse political candidates to invite
other candidates to respond. However, the Fairness Doctrine is different
from the Equal Time rule, which is still in force and requires equal time
be given to legally qualified political candidates.
