Yes, that is a far more meaningful answer, Reggie!

& yes.. my entry was [if only] slightly rhetorical. BUT also NOT, as I'm not near the researcher some o you wile e coyotes are and so (although it is my responsibility to do my own freaky fact checking, certainly) when posting the query I was actually hoping you (due diligence) or David (research central) or Ross (spends time, I think, in the region) or Heathcliffe (just plain well-versed in Earth & its beings) or Cassandra (conscientious on the up-&-up) or Mick (on the look-out for lampoon & other such dirt on the Yank & his piggy handlers) & other unmentioned able-bodied, whala-whalla-bing-baang, would maybe come back with signs of human evolution in ethics and legislation. Really, I mean it. I was hopin’. I'm ALWAYS hoping.

Now I’m gona give your reply a real good reread …and [maybe] reply with a lick o sense.

(Thanks, by the way, for the retort, Reg.)