MJG
location: Keeping a low profile amidst the crazy
listening to: Iron & Wine; Zero 7; Calexico; Massive Attack; Patricia Barber; Gorillaz
registered: 2002.08.19
posts: 1715
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I'm not saying that Glenn Beck didn't have an effect - actually, quite the opposite. For someone like Tim McViegh or the the guy who shot Tiller, there are direct connections with particular groups. These groups supplied the Philosophy, instruction of methods and the contacts (material and social) to carry out various acts. While these acts were not explicitly sanctioned by the group, casting the actor as a lone wolf and giving the group plausible deniability, there is no doubt that the act's genesis was with the group.What we are seeing now is a step beyond that. These ideas and philosophies have gained a level of media and social saturation that inspires random actors without any group associations. Within this dynamic, the tea party is not so much a group as a low level symptom. I don't see Dick Aremy's PAC as a leader, but as a media manipulator/provocateur. They started something that they cannot control, even if they wanted to. I referred to the Pittsburgh shootings in the previous post. The cops found literature from O'Rielly and Beck in his apartment, and these link to a particular dispenser of ideas. But this is going beyond that. There is such a media/social swarm of these ideas & philosophies that it has become impossible to trace it back to any particular source. Our social system itself is creating these actors.
–--
Where once We the People held capitalism’s leash, now we wear the collar.
Where once We the People held capitalism’s leash, now we wear the collar.
MJG
(view)
I'm not saying that Glenn Beck didn't have an effect - actually, quite the opposite. For someone like Tim McViegh or the the guy who shot Tiller, there are direct connections with particular groups. These groups supplied the Philosophy, instruction of methods and the contacts (material and social) to carry out various acts. While these acts were not explicitly sanctioned by the group, casting the actor as a lone wolf and giving the group plausible deniability, there is no doubt that the act's genesis was with the group.What we are seeing now is a step beyond that. These ideas and philosophies have gained a level of media and social saturation that inspires random actors without any group associations. Within this dynamic, the tea party is not so much a group as a low level symptom. I don't see Dick Aremy's PAC as a leader, but as a media manipulator/provocateur. They started something that they cannot control, even if they wanted to. I referred to the Pittsburgh shootings in the previous post. The cops found literature from O'Rielly and Beck in his apartment, and these link to a particular dispenser of ideas. But this is going beyond that. There is such a media/social swarm of these ideas & philosophies that it has become impossible to trace it back to any particular source. Our social system itself is creating these actors.
–--
Where once We the People held capitalism’s leash, now we wear the collar.
Where once We the People held capitalism’s leash, now we wear the collar.
posted 2010.02.19
posted on February 19th 2010
MJG
location: Keeping a low profile amidst the crazy
listening to: Iron & Wine; Zero 7; Calexico; Massive Attack; Patricia Barber; Gorillaz
registered: 2002.08.19
posts: 1715
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
... and so the Tea Party Revolution begins ... – edlorah on February 18th, 2010-
Re: ... the suicide note – MJG on February 18th, 2010-
Re: ... the suicide note – edlorah on February 18th, 2010-
Re: ... the suicide note – messybear on February 18th, 2010-
Re: ... the suicide note – edlorah on February 18th, 2010-
Shaking the tree – edlorah on February 18th, 2010-
Re: Shaking the tree – MJG on February 19th, 2010-
Re: Shaking the tree – edlorah on February 19th, 2010-
Re: Shaking the tree – MJG on February 19th, 2010
One problem there... – randym on February 21st, 2010-
Re: One problem there... – edlorah on February 21st, 2010
Pat, Randym, or is it Sybil? – Peter T. on February 21st, 2010-
Re: Pat, Randym, or is it Sybil? – mick on February 21st, 2010-
A Fig Tree Grows In Texas – Peter T. on February 21st, 2010-
Re: A RandyM Fig Shrivels In Texass – mick on February 21st, 2010
Peter America has the attention span of a fly – randym on February 22nd, 2010-
Re: Peter America has the attention span of a fly – mick on February 23rd, 2010-
distractibility – Andrea on February 23rd, 2010
Re: Peter America has the attention span of a fly – edlorah on February 23rd, 2010
Peter America Has the Attention Span of a Fly -page one by Reg – Reg on February 23rd, 2010-
Re: Peter America Has the Attention Span of a Fly -page one by Reg – heathcliffe on February 23rd, 2010-
Thanks Heath... – Reg on February 25th, 2010-
Re: Thanks Heath... – Baerwald on February 25th, 2010-
Re: Thanks Heath... – Reg on February 25th, 2010-
Re: Thanks Heath... – messybear on February 25th, 2010
Re: Peter America has the attention span of a fly – DavidM on February 23rd, 2010-
Re: Peter America has the attention span of a fly – mick on February 23rd, 2010-
Re: Peter America has the attention span of a fly – DavidM on February 24th, 2010-
Re: Peter America has the attention span of a fly – edlorah on February 24th, 2010
Pat, You Can't Possibly Be As Ignorant As Your Writing Suggests – Peter T. on February 23rd, 2010
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
