Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I am referencing the Wildlands Project, the Bio Diversity Treaty among numerous UN sponsored
conferences, agreements and proposals many nations have signed off on across several decades.
Agreements like NAFTA, the FTAA etc figured into the overall plan. All of which one might rightly
reference as steering committees.
Also, how about CBS news last night reporting that airline travel will shortly become an option
only
for the wealthy.
Isn't it open conspiracy, when our managers publish their intentions, but we don't read them?
peaceably
ps Then it becomes a matter of finding out who attended, representing whom, and after loads
of
like research and cross referencing, you can name individuals and organizations. E.g., Robert
Pastor has been pushing for the North American Union since the Carter Administration, but who
funds Mr Pastor, educators are notoriously poor earners? Or, who is Mr Pastor 'pitching' that idea
for? Who gains? Etc.
The problem Andrea, is I could lay out loads of names and organizations BUT until one does
their
own research, and begins to envision the extent of the interlocking tendrils for them self, MOST
find it impossible to believe(& truth be told, even their own research if they ever go that far). E.g.,
one could offer up the quotation that follows and someone will dismiss the thought put forward by
attacking the presenter as a conspiracy theorist and most peoples minds will dismiss further
consideration of the self evident meaning of the quotation. And yet, doesn't this notable gentleman
admit to undermining our nation?
"For more than a century, ideological extremists, at either end of the political spectrum, have
seized
upon well-publicized incidents, such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family
for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions.
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal, working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists," and of conspiring with others around
the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will.
If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, Random House, 2002, page 405.
Hope that helps...
peaceably
Question: Are the people MJG mentions the first cause decision makers?
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
I am referencing the Wildlands Project, the Bio Diversity Treaty among numerous UN sponsored
conferences, agreements and proposals many nations have signed off on across several decades.
Agreements like NAFTA, the FTAA etc figured into the overall plan. All of which one might rightly
reference as steering committees.
Also, how about CBS news last night reporting that airline travel will shortly become an option
only
for the wealthy.
Isn't it open conspiracy, when our managers publish their intentions, but we don't read them?
peaceably
ps Then it becomes a matter of finding out who attended, representing whom, and after loads
of
like research and cross referencing, you can name individuals and organizations. E.g., Robert
Pastor has been pushing for the North American Union since the Carter Administration, but who
funds Mr Pastor, educators are notoriously poor earners? Or, who is Mr Pastor 'pitching' that idea
for? Who gains? Etc.
The problem Andrea, is I could lay out loads of names and organizations BUT until one does
their
own research, and begins to envision the extent of the interlocking tendrils for them self, MOST
find it impossible to believe(& truth be told, even their own research if they ever go that far). E.g.,
one could offer up the quotation that follows and someone will dismiss the thought put forward by
attacking the presenter as a conspiracy theorist and most peoples minds will dismiss further
consideration of the self evident meaning of the quotation. And yet, doesn't this notable gentleman
admit to undermining our nation?
"For more than a century, ideological extremists, at either end of the political spectrum, have
seized
upon well-publicized incidents, such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family
for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions.
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal, working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists," and of conspiring with others around
the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will.
If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, Random House, 2002, page 405.
Hope that helps...
peaceably
Question: Are the people MJG mentions the first cause decision makers?
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
