I thought my answer was evident PK.

I do not believe the earth is but 6000 years old. Meaning consideration of the ice cores seem perfectly valid, and given that I use them in my arguments, I also thought my position evident. Perhaps you've missed such observation on my part in the past and missed the inferences to be taken therefrom.

Other than that, your response seems awfully agitated.

peaceably ~~~

accredited media=no need to suffer the strain of sifting or thinking huh.

~~~

"from the Word of God PK." BS. You pick and choose the pieces of scripture that suit your argument.

And that makes me unusual how. And it was from the scripture we were arguing over, weren't it? C'mon Mon!