Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Given that I am a man who believes in a literal Hell, you might be surprised to know I tend to
agree with your legalization conclusion and disagree with, "the first step on the road to hell."
being whatever taste one first tastes. I'm a firm believer that first step is lodged in ones heart,
not some substance one decides to ruin oneself with. And frankly, not all people ruin
themselves. Many multiple millions function quite nicely as addicts of one sort or another including heroin
addicts. My Mrs can't live without her fags. It's just that the powers that be have decided
coffee and cigarettes are more beneficial to society than not(at least for now:). [Econ 101,
addictive substances have greater price flexibility so tobacco settlements actually make for a
wonderfully dressed up means for creating a wider tax revenue stream without the backlash.
Human stupidity(mine included) is hilarious on some level or other ain't it? lol] Hell, the Brit
manufacturers, after discovering the benefits of coffee in the new world(sic), originally plied
their workers with coffee for free, as it made for more attentive workers and improved
attendance too if I recall correct.But again, if it were legal, say as opium and cocaine were a century ago, there wouldn't be
anybody to put in private prisons, and of course all the support personnel etc, at taxpayer
expense. The latter being an utter drain on any economy, as they produce so little anybody
would pay for willingly, and thus the coercion.And upon further reflection PK, I prolly should have said, small time dealers, which is what I
was, as your point makes perfect sense when I recall the sudden crop of hangers-on who were
leaning on me to use some sort of laxative from Canada(as it'd already been outlawed in the
states, an idea which thoroughly grossed me out, as was already a back to nature type way
back then MB), so I could give them a free toot. It was actually a temporary sideline, my
specialty was clean full weight ounces of herb for adult usage only. Also an oddity in my
district, and thus a very popular minimal hassle seller(no stems, no seeds dadeedee ...). Pot
heads were better at planning ahead, and rarely woke us in the wee hours for a bit more kick.peaceably
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
Given that I am a man who believes in a literal Hell, you might be surprised to know I tend to
agree with your legalization conclusion and disagree with, "the first step on the road to hell."
being whatever taste one first tastes. I'm a firm believer that first step is lodged in ones heart,
not some substance one decides to ruin oneself with. And frankly, not all people ruin
themselves. Many multiple millions function quite nicely as addicts of one sort or another including heroin
addicts. My Mrs can't live without her fags. It's just that the powers that be have decided
coffee and cigarettes are more beneficial to society than not(at least for now:). [Econ 101,
addictive substances have greater price flexibility so tobacco settlements actually make for a
wonderfully dressed up means for creating a wider tax revenue stream without the backlash.
Human stupidity(mine included) is hilarious on some level or other ain't it? lol] Hell, the Brit
manufacturers, after discovering the benefits of coffee in the new world(sic), originally plied
their workers with coffee for free, as it made for more attentive workers and improved
attendance too if I recall correct.But again, if it were legal, say as opium and cocaine were a century ago, there wouldn't be
anybody to put in private prisons, and of course all the support personnel etc, at taxpayer
expense. The latter being an utter drain on any economy, as they produce so little anybody
would pay for willingly, and thus the coercion.And upon further reflection PK, I prolly should have said, small time dealers, which is what I
was, as your point makes perfect sense when I recall the sudden crop of hangers-on who were
leaning on me to use some sort of laxative from Canada(as it'd already been outlawed in the
states, an idea which thoroughly grossed me out, as was already a back to nature type way
back then MB), so I could give them a free toot. It was actually a temporary sideline, my
specialty was clean full weight ounces of herb for adult usage only. Also an oddity in my
district, and thus a very popular minimal hassle seller(no stems, no seeds dadeedee ...). Pot
heads were better at planning ahead, and rarely woke us in the wee hours for a bit more kick.peaceably
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
posted 2007.07.30
posted on July 30th 2007
G
Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
why do you think they call it dope? – edlorah on July 27th, 2007-
Re: why do you think they call it dope? – pkjensen on July 27th, 2007-
speaking of which – cassandra on July 27th, 2007-
Re: speaking of which – messybear on July 28th, 2007
Re: speaking of which – Eugene on July 28th, 2007
-
-
-
