Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I know who you got the quotes from Pat. I listened to the actual
courtroom sentencing on that very channel.
The quote Lee sent you proves my point:
"But Judge Cashman said the 60-day sentence guaranteed
that
Hulett would get into sex offender rehabilitation quickly or face a
possible life sentence. He said he had no choice because the
Corrections Department classified Hulett as a low risk offender
meaning he can't get treatment until he's out of jail."
Can you see it there, Corrections would have released this sex
offender in order that he get treatment(agin not the Judges fault),
which in his case was only available on the outside(agin not the
Judges fault). What you don't have here is the fact that he could
have received treatment in jail but because of the rules mentioned
here in terms of this offenders classification(agin not the Judges
fault), AND, because our legislature had not authorized monies so
that an offender of his classification could receive treatment in
prison(agin not the Judges fault).
Since this brouhaha broke, the legislature has made moneys
available so that this dubious treatment can occur, in jail, for an
offender of his classification; and the offender, has been
resentenced accordingly(the Judges doing).
Judge Cashman, quite apart from O'Reilly or WCAX, took a
calculated risk and sentenced in accordance with what was actually
going to transpire due to legislative rule making. I believe he did it
to illustrate for the public the shortcomings of the rules he is
bound to follow but did not create, in hopes of nudging the
legislature to fix this problem they inadvertently created.
And Pat, something else Lee could have told you about me
but
assuredly didn't:
If it were up to me, I would solve this problem one offender at
a
time as they crop up, by applying the death penalty to rapists and
child molesters. It may not deter anyone else, but it insures, that
one will never harm an other innocent. Pedaphiles are notorious
repeat offenders.
Finally, as with O'Reilly in this instance, Lee has an agenda
too. But
thanks fer playing along Pat.
The thing is I have no respect for any of you three.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
I know who you got the quotes from Pat. I listened to the actual
courtroom sentencing on that very channel.
The quote Lee sent you proves my point:
"But Judge Cashman said the 60-day sentence guaranteed
that
Hulett would get into sex offender rehabilitation quickly or face a
possible life sentence. He said he had no choice because the
Corrections Department classified Hulett as a low risk offender
meaning he can't get treatment until he's out of jail."
Can you see it there, Corrections would have released this sex
offender in order that he get treatment(agin not the Judges fault),
which in his case was only available on the outside(agin not the
Judges fault). What you don't have here is the fact that he could
have received treatment in jail but because of the rules mentioned
here in terms of this offenders classification(agin not the Judges
fault), AND, because our legislature had not authorized monies so
that an offender of his classification could receive treatment in
prison(agin not the Judges fault).
Since this brouhaha broke, the legislature has made moneys
available so that this dubious treatment can occur, in jail, for an
offender of his classification; and the offender, has been
resentenced accordingly(the Judges doing).
Judge Cashman, quite apart from O'Reilly or WCAX, took a
calculated risk and sentenced in accordance with what was actually
going to transpire due to legislative rule making. I believe he did it
to illustrate for the public the shortcomings of the rules he is
bound to follow but did not create, in hopes of nudging the
legislature to fix this problem they inadvertently created.
And Pat, something else Lee could have told you about me
but
assuredly didn't:
If it were up to me, I would solve this problem one offender at
a
time as they crop up, by applying the death penalty to rapists and
child molesters. It may not deter anyone else, but it insures, that
one will never harm an other innocent. Pedaphiles are notorious
repeat offenders.
Finally, as with O'Reilly in this instance, Lee has an agenda
too. But
thanks fer playing along Pat.
The thing is I have no respect for any of you three.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
posted 2007.02.11
posted on February 11th 2007
G
Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Justice served – Kyle T. on February 9th, 2007-
Thanks Kyle! – PatBrown on February 10th, 2007-
Re: Thanks Kyle! – Baerwald on February 10th, 2007-
Re: Bill O. – dale on February 10th, 2007-
Bullshit..... – EEE on February 10th, 2007
Re: Bill O. – Baerwald on February 10th, 2007
Instead of using a blanket statement – PatBrown on February 10th, 2007
Re: Thanks Kyle! – edlorah on February 10th, 2007
-
-
-
-
