Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Howdo Andrea:One of my first questions would be how did her school
board get a letter she wrote to her congressman.That suggests an agenda on the congressman's part, or
some member of that office.Certainly the school board's translation indicates an agenda
to try her in the court of public opinion with both the legal
and illegal spanish speaking community her school served.And what conclusion can one come to, other than that
presumably, the very same body immediately suspended her
while also threatening her future livelihood for employing
her first amendment rights of free speech in addressing her
congressional representation in order to seek US Law be
enforced for the benefit(health and educational) of the tax
paying citizens and their children of her district. I would
argue too, they may have endangered her person.I have as limited facts as yourself but it appears, she was
treated as if she were guilty until proven innocent because
she believed it her right and duty under the US Constitution
to advise her congressional representation of some
extremely pertinent facts affecting their district. Not unlike the border agents our government prosecuted in
behalf of an illegal, for doing their job. LOL, silly citizen ain't she, LOL.The real black humor in this is that most that read this, or
more especially the link you are responding to, don't believe
how near this jeopardy is to their own door.respectsps Andrea, if I short changed in my response, do let me
know.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
Howdo Andrea:One of my first questions would be how did her school
board get a letter she wrote to her congressman.That suggests an agenda on the congressman's part, or
some member of that office.Certainly the school board's translation indicates an agenda
to try her in the court of public opinion with both the legal
and illegal spanish speaking community her school served.And what conclusion can one come to, other than that
presumably, the very same body immediately suspended her
while also threatening her future livelihood for employing
her first amendment rights of free speech in addressing her
congressional representation in order to seek US Law be
enforced for the benefit(health and educational) of the tax
paying citizens and their children of her district. I would
argue too, they may have endangered her person.I have as limited facts as yourself but it appears, she was
treated as if she were guilty until proven innocent because
she believed it her right and duty under the US Constitution
to advise her congressional representation of some
extremely pertinent facts affecting their district. Not unlike the border agents our government prosecuted in
behalf of an illegal, for doing their job. LOL, silly citizen ain't she, LOL.The real black humor in this is that most that read this, or
more especially the link you are responding to, don't believe
how near this jeopardy is to their own door.respectsps Andrea, if I short changed in my response, do let me
know.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
