Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I thought this apt for sharing:)
When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does
not face men of
sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing
mark is that they
are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of
comprehending any save the
most elemental -- men whose whole thinking is done in terms
of emotion, and
whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot
understand. So
confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack, or
count himself
lost. His one aim is to disarm suspicion, to arouse confidence
in his
orthodoxy, to avoid challenge. If he is a man of convictions, of
enthusiasm,
or self-respect, it is cruelly harder.The larger the mob, the harder the test. In small areas, before
small
electorates, a first rate man occasionally fights his way
through, carrying
even a mob with him by the force of his personality. But when
the field
is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second
or third hand,
and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt,
then all
the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically the most devious
and mediocre
-- the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his
mind is a
virtual vacuum.The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As
democracy is
perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the
inner soul of
the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their hearts desire at last, and
the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.--H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
I thought this apt for sharing:)
When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does
not face men of
sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing
mark is that they
are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of
comprehending any save the
most elemental -- men whose whole thinking is done in terms
of emotion, and
whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot
understand. So
confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack, or
count himself
lost. His one aim is to disarm suspicion, to arouse confidence
in his
orthodoxy, to avoid challenge. If he is a man of convictions, of
enthusiasm,
or self-respect, it is cruelly harder.The larger the mob, the harder the test. In small areas, before
small
electorates, a first rate man occasionally fights his way
through, carrying
even a mob with him by the force of his personality. But when
the field
is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second
or third hand,
and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt,
then all
the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically the most devious
and mediocre
-- the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his
mind is a
virtual vacuum.The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As
democracy is
perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the
inner soul of
the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their hearts desire at last, and
the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.--H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
